Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Claims about guns often miss the target

Adventure Outdoors salesman Adam James shows a shotgun to customers. The Smyrna, Ga. gun shop, shooting range and outdoor supply facility saw a 300 percent increase in gun sales shortly after the July 2012 movie theater shootings in Colorado. Adventure Outdoors salesman Adam James shows a shotgun to customers. The Smyrna, Ga. gun shop, shooting range and outdoor supply facility saw a 300 percent increase in gun sales shortly after the July 2012 movie theater shootings in Colorado.

Adventure Outdoors salesman Adam James shows a shotgun to customers. The Smyrna, Ga. gun shop, shooting range and outdoor supply facility saw a 300 percent increase in gun sales shortly after the July 2012 movie theater shootings in Colorado.

Bill Adair
By Bill Adair April 8, 2013

The debate over gun control has become a battle of talking points.  If you've followed the debate, you've probably heard these lines:


"Forty percent of guns are purchased without a background check."


"There are more people killed with baseball bats and hammers than are killed with guns."


"Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are negotiating with the United Nations about doing a treaty that will ban the use of firearms."


But those statements, like so many in the gun control debate, are exaggerations or falsehoods. The 40 percent claim earned a Half True on PolitiFact's Truth-O-Meter because it relies on a study nearly 20 years old and uses a relatively small sample. The baseball bat claim earned a Pants on Fire because deaths from handguns alone are more than 12-times higher than clubs and hammers. The statement about the U.N. treaty also got a Pants on Fire because there is no evidence the Obama administration is pursuing such a ban.

Sign up for PolitiFact texts


With the Senate likely to discuss gun legislation this week, we thought it would be helpful to analyze our fact-checking on the subject. We have examined more than 130 statements about guns and rated more than half to be Half True or lower.  But we've also found that claims about guns fare better on the Truth-O-Meter than claims for all subjects.


Here's how they compare:

 

Rating

Gun claims

All claims

True

18%

18%

Mostly True

26

18

Half True

26

21

Mostly False

6

15

False

15

20

Pants on Fire

9

8

 

We researched the gun control position for each person or group we rated and found gun control opponents have earned more False and Pants on Fire ratings than supporters of gun control:

 

Rating

Gun control opponents

Gun control supporters

True

17%

20%

Mostly True

16

38

Half True

22

30

Mostly False

7

3

False

24

8

Pants on Fire

14

2

 

Our analysis shows that some types of gun claims get higher ratings than others.


When politicians cite their opponents' records on guns, they usually get the facts right and earn a True or a Mostly True. But when politicians or groups make claims about current laws being insufficient -- a common tactic for gun control supporters -- they often earn Half True ratings because they leave out important details or take things out of context.


By contrast, claims about the Obama administration's plans for gun control, often made by people and groups opposed to gun control, typically earn a False or Pants on Fire.

Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter

Our Sources

See original stories

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Bill Adair

Claims about guns often miss the target