"We spent approximately $20-billion of that money on pork barrel, earmark projects. Maybe if we had done it right, maybe some of that money would have gone to inspect those bridges and other bridges across the country."
Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Right on bridge repairs
Responding to the bridge collapse in Minneapolis, Sen. John McCain said that if less money had been spent on earmarked projects in highway reauthorization bills, then more money could be spent on bridge repairs.
McCain is right. Bridge repair and bridge construction are authorized in the same bill. But of course, members of Congress would prefer to cut ribbons on new projects rather than see money go to less sexy repair projects.
House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman James Oberstar, D-Minn., recently unveiled a new plan to invest $65-billion immediately in replacing or repairing bridges. Rather than redirecting money in the highway bill, Oberstar has proposed establishing a dedicated fund for bridge repair. But raising that $65-billion within the federal budget would be a huge problem.
Featured Fact-check
Our Sources
American Society of Civil Engineers, Infrastructure Report Card
Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation, Review of Congressional Earmarks
House Transportation Committee
Interviews with former Rep. Ernest Istook, R-Okla., and Keith Ashdown, chief investigator, Taxpayers for Common Sense
Browse the Truth-O-Meter
More by David Baumann
Right on bridge repairs
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.