Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner says 75 percent of closed air traffic towers are in Republican districts
Dozens of small airports around the country were touched by federal budget cuts under a decision announced March 22, 2013, by the Federal Aviation Administration.
A total of 149 air traffic control towers operated by private contractors will be shut down, the agency decided. The decision was one of the most high profile and broad based actions to come under the politically charged sequestration cuts.
Eight Wisconsin airports are on the list, including Crites Field in Waukesha, which lies in the district of U.S. Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner (R-Menomonee Falls).
Sensenbrenner issued a news release March 22, 2013, criticizing the FAA decision, saying the "contract towers" save money and have fewer safety problems. He also noted that the FAA’s budget was being cut 5 percent, but the spending for the contract towers was dropping 75 percent.
Sensenbrenner added: "Not coincidentally, 75 percent of the towers the Obama Administration is closing are located in Republican Congressional Districts."
Sign up for PolitiFact texts
Critics have said the administration is playing politics with the budget cuts. But Sensenbrenner’s claim was one of the first we’ve seen that quantified this complaint.
Are 75 percent in GOP districts?
We asked the congressman’s office for evidence to support his claim. That’s when we started to feel some turbulence.
"That information came from a member of the aviation subcommittee," responded Sensenbrenner spokesman Ben Miller in an email. We asked him to be more precise about the source of the claim and the actual number.
Three days after our initial inquiry, Miller responded: "We have reissued the press release noting the correction. I appreciate you pointing it out."
Wait a minute.
We didn’t offer a correction. We only asked a question.
The reissued news release carried the notation "updated," and this information: "(A statistic in the previous release was unverifiable)."
Miller elaborated in an email: "We received (the statistic) from the office of a member on the Aviation subcommittee and are unwilling to throw anyone under the bus. We couldn’t verify the statistic we received and therefore issued a retraction. Unfortunately, Rep. Sensenbrenner is unavailable for an interview today."
Still curious on the number, we started searching, emailing and mapping.
Sensenbrenner’s claim was repeated in several news accounts of his reaction to the budget cuts, including on Fox News and in the Janesville Gazette. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel coverage did not include the claim.)
We did come across a similar claim from another House member, U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Penn.).
"Two out of every three towers slated for closure are in Republican Congressional districts," Pitts said in a March 7, 2013 news release. "Unfortunately, this political game has real implications for public safety."
The statement by Pitts, who is not a member of the aviation subcommittee, came before the FAA announced its final tower closing list. At the time, there was a preliminary list of 189 airports.
Featured Fact-check
Pitts, whose district includes one of the airports, did some analysis of that preliminary list, said spokesman Andrew Wimer.
"We had some of our interns here look up some of the ZIP codes," of the affected towers and then cross referenced that information with congressional districts, Wimer said. The result: Just under 66 percent were in Republican districts, Wimer said.
Wimer declined to release the data, and he would not say what the survey results say about the final closing list.
So we’re on our own to test Sensenbrenner’s claim. We plotted the 149 towers set for closure on a map. And then we cross referenced by party with congressional districts.
Of the 149 airports slated for closure, four fall inside two separate congressional districts. Of those four, two sit in two Republican districts while the other two straddle a Republican and a Democratic district.
The overall breakdown of the House is 234 Republicans to 201 Democrats, which means Republicans have about 54 percent of the seats.
There is another factor at play: Many of the affected airports are in less-populated rural areas that tend to lean Republican.
Let’s land this item.
Arguing politics were involved in the FAA’s tower closing decision, Sensenbrenner said 75 percent of the towers set to close were in Republican districts.
Three days after we asked about it, Sensenbrenner removed the claim and, in at least in one version of the statement, included a note saying a previous version relied on "unverifiable" information. It would have been more accurate to say that the statement was unverified.
We verified the numbers. And we rate the statement False.
(Click here to search an interactive map of the location of the towers slated to close, along with the details of the congressional district where the tower is located)
Our Sources
Press release, Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, (R-Menomonee Falls), March 22, 2013
Revised press release, Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, (R-Menomonee Falls), March 25, 2013 (still dated March 22)
Revised press release(with note about ‘unverifiable information’), Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, (R-Menomonee Falls), March 25, 2013
Fox News.com,"FAA to close 149 air traffic towers," March 22, 2013 Telephone interview, Andrew Wimer, communications director, Rep. Joe Pitts, (R-Penn.), March 26, 2013
Federal Aviation Administration press release, March 22, 2013
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "FAA to close 149 air traffic control towers beginning April 7," March 22, 2013
Telephone interview, Laura Brown, spokeswoman, Federal Aviation Administration, March 25, 2013
Emails, Ben Miller, spokesman, Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner (R-Menomonee Falls), March 22, 25, 2013
Browse the Truth-O-Meter
More by James B. Nelson
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner says 75 percent of closed air traffic towers are in Republican districts
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.