Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

By Dave Umhoefer June 27, 2014

In Democratic Party video ad, Scott Walker nods yes when asked if he’s part of ‘criminal scheme’

Five days after an unsealed legal brief spelled out John Doe prosecutors’ suspicions that Gov. Scott Walker helped run a "criminal scheme" to violate campaign laws, the Democratic Party of Wisconsin posted a web video.

The video, "Wisconsin Deserves Better," ends with a question-and-answer segment in which Walker appears to acknowledge guilt.

That sequence starts with audio of part of a question asked of Walker by reporter Charles Benson of WTMJ-TV, the NBC affiliate in Milwaukee. He was among a group of reporters seeking Walker’s reaction on June 19, 2014, after the legal brief came out as part of a lawsuit by a conservative group under investigation in the Doe probe.

Benson, not shown at first, is heard saying to Walker: "...that you are the center of a criminal scheme. Are you?"

Abruptly, the audio goes out, the video goes to slow motion, and Walker nods his head up and down with eyes closed and sort of a grim look on his face.

Sign up for PolitiFact texts

"Our State Deserves Better" appears on the screen as the video ends without any verbal evidence of Walker’s response to Benson.

The video is on the party’s YouTube channel, and was promoted on its Facebook page and state party’s website.

Tale of the tape

At the bottom of the screen during the sequence with Benson and Walker, the video credit appears to be WEAU-TV, the NBC affiliate in Eau Claire. The station picked up the feed from WTMJ and aired it June 20.

But the report originally aired on WTMJ, so we looked at the station’s segment regarding the release of the prosecution’s brief and Walker’s reaction.

We examined the relevant parts of the TMJ interview, and the Dem video, and created our own video with those clips back to back.

In the WTMJ segment, anchors introduce the story and then go to Benson, who says, "Well, the new documents are public after conservative groups sued in Federal Court to stop the investigation. Prosecutors allege a criminal scheme. Walker says the allegations from a partisan Milwaukee D.A. are false."

After showing some highlights of the prosecution’s theory of the case, the segment cuts to Benson questioning Walker. It’s the complete version of the sequence truncated by the Dems in their video.

The first tipoff to the fact that the Dem video is manipulated: In the WTMJ segment, unlike in the Dem video, Benson is on screen when he asks Walker: "Prosecutors in the John Doe investigation allege that you are at the center of a criminal scheme. Are you?"

"No," Walker says immediately, shaking his head side to side. The WTMJ segments cuts away at that point, back to Benson, who says: "Walker says no laws were broken, and the case was rejected by two judges who have reviewed the allegations."

Finally, WTMJ cuts back to the reporters interviewing Walker, who is shown saying, "And I asked people to look at the facts, and the facts are pretty clear. A judge at the state and the federal level made it clear that they didn’t buy into this argument. They said to move on."

It doesn’t take a degree in YouTube to see that Walker actually bobbed his head "yes" during Benson’s question, not in response to Benson. (As those who follow Walker know, he uses the head bob frequently when listening to people as he campaigns or when taking in reporters’ questions.)

Featured Fact-check

We asked Democratic Party of Wisconsin chairman Mike Tate about the discrepancy between the two videos.

Tate referred us to party spokeswoman Melissa Baldauff, who acknowledged that it appears Walker shakes his head yes in the party’s video.

It wasn’t intentional or an attempt to mislead, Baldauff said. The party was trying to "layer together clips" of news coverage of the Doe issue and about the jobs reports that came out the same week, she said.

Walker campaign spokesman Tom Evenson wasn’t buying that explanation Friday.

"This Democrat Party propaganda is another attempt to mislead the voters from the facts and distract from Mary Burke's failed record as Jim Doyle's commerce secretary," Evenson said, referring to Walker’s leading Democratic Party challenger in the fall governor’s race.

WTMJ news director Janet Hundley and WEAU general manager Terry McHugh assisted PolitiFact in locating video of the Walker segment. Neither wanted to comment on the Dem video.

Our rating

A Democratic Party web video making the rounds on social media shows a grim-faced Gov. Scott Walker appearing to bob his head yes to a reporter’s question about whether he was at the center of a "criminal scheme" to evade campaign finance laws.

In real life, the governor answered an emphatic "no" --  not surprising given he’s been denying any wrongdoing since new documents were released in the John Doe investigation.

The Dem video, in its editing of the WTMJ clip, leaves the viewer with the misleading and ridiculous impression that Walker is somehow admitting guilt in the case.

That’s the definition of Pants on Fire.

Our Sources

Democratic Party of Wisconsin web video, June 24, 2014

Journal Sentinel-produced video comparing the WTMJ interview and the same interview in the Democratic Party video, created June 27, 2014

WTMJ4-TV, "Prosecutors: Gov. Walker part of ‘criminal scheme,’" June 19, 2014

Email exchange with Terry McHugh, vice president and general manager, WEAU-TV, and Mike Lopez, news director, June 27, 2014

Email exchange with Janet Hundley, WTMJ news director, June 27, 2014

Interview with Melissa Baldauff, Democratic Party of Wisconsin, June 27, 2014

Interview with Tom Evenson, Friend of Scott Walker, June 27, 2014

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Dave Umhoefer

In Democratic Party video ad, Scott Walker nods yes when asked if he’s part of ‘criminal scheme’

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up