No, American Rescue Plan does not cost more than World War II

Since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, there have been some eye-popping numbers coming out of Washington, D.C., including this one: $1.9 trillion.

That’s the price tag for the Biden Administration’s COVID stimulus plan. The measure cleared the Senate and House on narrow, largely party-line votes. All of Wisconsin’s Democrats supported the plan, while all Republicans were opposed.

Republican Derrick Van Orden, who lost to 12-term U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, D-La Crosse, by fewer than 3 percentage points in 2020, and has said he’ll run again in 2022, has been hammering Kind on the package’s cost.

For example, on May 11, 2021, Kind sent this tweet:

"Thanks to the #AmericanRescuePlan, Wisconsin is receiving over $50M in funding for our seniors. This money will help provide relief and expand access to meals, vaccines, caregiver support, health resources, and more." 

That same day, Van Orden retweeted Kind’s message and added this, in part: 

"@RepRonKind Has spent more $ in 100+ days than was spent fighting WWII, setting the country on the road to record inflation that will destroy our senior's retirements."

Is Van Orden right about the cost of the American Rescue Plan, the primary measure that has passed since Biden took office in January?

In short, let’s say the claim is, well, inflated.

Van Orden did not respond to emails from PolitiFact Wisconsin requesting backup for his claim. 

But let’s dig in anyway, with this important note up front: When comparing dollar amounts over time -- particularly a period of about eight decades -- you can’t just look at raw spending totals. Everything costs far more now than it did then.

In other words, for a fair comparison, you have to control for inflation.

In June 2019, USA Today published an article titled "What were the 13 most expensive wars in U.S. history?"  To compile the list 24/7 Wall St., a Delaware company that runs an online financial news operation, used a 2010 report from the Congressional Research Service titled "Costs of Major U.S. Wars" and updated the numbers for inflationary purposes. 

For some context, here are the top five wars, and total U.S. spending (all in 2019 dollars).

5. Korean War: $389.81 billion

4. Vietnam War: $843.63 billion

3. War in Afghanistan: $910.47 billion

2. Iraq War: $1.01 trillion

1. World War II: $4.69 trillion

Featured Fact-check

Threads posts

stated on November 13, 2024 in a Threads post

Nissan just announced 9,000 layoffs in Tennessee “to avoid severe losses due to expected tariffs.”

So, World War II -- which the U.S. entered in 1941 and which lasted until 1945 -- is the most expensive, by far. 

But it was far more expensive than the Biden Administration’s stimulus package, not the reverse as Van Orden claimed.

What’s more, the $1.9 trillion stimulus passed under President Joe Biden was less than the $2.2 trillion CARES Act passed under Republican President Donald Trump in March 2020. All told, the various stimulus and relief bills passed under Trump in 2020 tallied $3.8 trillion.

To be sure, Biden has proposed several massive spending plans, including a separate American Jobs Plan -- a $2.3 trillion development package aimed at improving the nation's aging infrastructure, among other spending. His recently-unveiled federal budget includes $5 trillion in new federal spending over the next decade. 

But Van Orden did not cite those measures in tweeting his claim about Kind.

Rather, he specifically responded to a Kind tweet about the American Rescue Plan and cited what Kind had already voted for, not what is on the table.

Van Orden said "@RepRonKind "has spent more $ in 100+ days than was spent fighting WWII." 

According to a 2010 Congressional Research Service report, and additional calculations to cover more recent inflation, World War II’s price tag (in 2019 dollars) was $4.69 trillion.

The American Rescue Plan signed into law in March by Biden -- and supported by Kind -- carries a cost of $1.9 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. 

We rate Van Orden’s claim False.