President Joe Biden established programs to direct 40% of federal spending on clean energy and energy efficiency to disadvantaged communities, but independent assessments have called the effort's results mixed.
In 2021, Biden included the 40% target in an executive order on climate change, calling it the Justice40 Initiative. The effort focused on clean energy and energy efficiency; clean transit; affordable and sustainable housing; training and workforce development; remediation and reduction of legacy pollution; water infrastructure development; and climate change resiliency.
The administration also created a "climate and economic justice screening tool" to determine which areas should be considered disadvantaged, and it established an "Environmental Justice Scorecard" to measure progress toward the 40% goal.
An analysis by the Government Accountability Office, a federal watchdog agency, found that for a majority of the pilot programs under Justice40, department officials spoke positively of the initiative, but some complained about "challenges, such as unclear guidance."
Another assessment, by the environmental think tank Resources for the Future, reviewed 445 programs considered part of the initiative, more than one-third of which were at the Energy Department. Of those 445 programs, the think tank found that 98, or 22%, had met the initiative's goals by including provisions that directed at least 40% of the money to disadvantaged communities. An additional 80, or 18%, appeared to be adhering to the goal but had not produced proof. The group found that 30% of programs had made no progress.
Among the efforts that were "fully implementing" Justice40's goals by early 2024 were Federal Emergency Management Agency and Transportation Department grant programs to boost protections to allow infrastructure to withstand climate change; Environmental Protection Agency programs to improve solid waste infrastructure and to clean up contaminated sites, including leaking underground storage tanks; and a Department of Housing and Urban Development program to address lead hazards.
Resources for the Future also found that although the climate and economic justice screening tool "has some strengths, it also has some limitations."
A White House-created advisory council, meanwhile, said the environmental justice scorecard could be "much more robust." An environmental justice advocacy group, Just Solutions, said it was "difficult to determine" whether the government is "actually reaching the 40 percent target" when using the scorecard.
Overall, Biden's efforts qualify as "a work in progress," with "some early success stories," but "uneven" implementation, Resources for the Future concluded.
Adrien Salazar, policy director with Grassroots Global Justice, an environmental justice advocacy group, also found mixed results.
"In general, the Biden administration has done a great deal" to advance Justice40, including "integrating environmental justice objectives across agencies," he said. "But the progress is incomplete, and the metrics by which we can assess whether or not the goals of Justice40 are being met are either not being collected, or publicly available, or both."
This uncertainty could be moot once Donald Trump returns to the White House. Just Solutions has written that most or all of the environmental justice programs Biden established are "likely at risk of being eliminated," probably by an executive order that reverses the one Biden signed.
Biden created multiple federal mechanisms to send disadvantaged communities 40% of certain types of federal spending, and independent analyses found that some programs had already met those goals. But by the time Biden exits the White House, many aspects of his promise will be unmet, and Trump could shutter the programs.
We rate the promise Compromise.