Donald Trump promised during his first campaign to slash federal regulations, particularly those passed by President Barack Obama before he took office.
The number of federal regulations essentially remained the same with Trump as president.
On his first day in office, Trump temporarily froze all new regulations, a typical move for an incoming president. He also signed an executive order that requires agencies to repeal two existing regulations in order to pass a new one.
When Trump took office, there were 1,079,651 regulatory restrictions in the U.S. code of federal regulations, said James Broughel, an expert on regulations at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. As of mid-June, the total number was just slightly higher: 1,082,303.
Broughel said that the numbers are a proxy for the number of requirements in the code and count terms such as "shall, must, may not, prohibited and required." Another way to quantify regulations is to look at total pages in the code, and by that metric, it shrunk slightly from 186,374 pages in 2017 to 185,984 pages in 2019.
"By either metric the story is more or less the same — overall the amount of federal regulations is roughly unchanged since President Trump took office," Broughel said. (Broughel is on an advisory board that gives advice to the Department of Energy on energy efficiency standards.)
While some rules were eliminated by the Trump administration, other rules were being added.
Broughel said the number of federal regulations typically increases during a president's term.
The Trump administration "had success at slowing the flow of new regulatory activity but hasn't had much success of reducing overall stock of regulations," he said.
The Trump administration repealed an Obama rule regarding car emissions standards, rescinded guidance on transgender student rights, repealed a rule on net neutrality and rescinded Clean Power Plan, which was designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Trump also took prominent regulatory action, too, such as a change to the public charge rule, longstanding regulations that say immigrants to the United States can be turned away if they are likely to depend on public assistance programs.
"While the direction of this administration is deregulatory with respect to energy and environmental issues, for example, it is decidedly regulatory when it comes to other areas such as immigration," Bridget C.E. Dooling, a research professor with the GW Regulatory Studies Center. Dooling held positions in the federal government during the administrations of Bush, Obama and Trump.
Trump has at times exaggerated his record on how many regulations he has cut. But we found overall he did take many steps to limit new regulations. We rate this promise Compromise.